4.7 Article

Cisplatin, gemcitabine, and ifosfamide as weekly therapy: A feasibility and phase II study of salvage treatment for advanced transitional-cell carcinoma

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 20, 期 13, 页码 2965-2970

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2002.11.114

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA16672] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: We investigated the feasibility, safety, and antitumor activity of weekly gemcitabine given in combination with low doses of cisplatin and ifosfamide in previously treated patients with advanced transitional-cell carcinoma (TCC) of the urothelium. Patients and Methods: Patients with measurable, metastatic or unresectable TCC who had received one or two prior chemotherapy regimens were eligible. On a 28-day course, doses of cisplatin 30 mg/m(2), gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2), and ifosfamide 1 g/m(2) were given on day 1 and then repeated on day 8 and day 15 unless there was dose-limiting hematologic toxicity. Results: Fifty-one patients were registered; 10 patients participated in a pilot study, after which 41 patients were registered onto the phase If protocol. Forty-eight patients (94.1%) had dose-limiting hematologic toxicity on day 8 or day 15. Nonhematologic toxicity of grade 3 or greater consisted mainly of nausea and vomiting (seven patients, 13.7%) and infection (seven patients, 13.7%). Responses could be assessed in 49 of 51 eligible patients; two complete responses (4.1%) and 18 partial responses (36.7%) were observed for an overall response rate of 40.8% (exact 95% confidence interval, 27% to 56%). Conclusion: This regimen of cisplatin, gemcitabine, and ifosfamide is not feasible for weekly administration because of hematologic toxicity. Nevertheless, there was promising activity with only two doses per 28-day cycle. On the basis of these results, we have initiated a phase 11 trial of this combination given as a single dose every 14 days in patients with untreated, metastatic urothelial carcinoma. (C) 2002 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据