4.8 Article

Excess copper predisposes photosystem II to photoinhibition in vivo by outcompeting iron and causing decrease in leaf chlorophyll

期刊

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
卷 129, 期 3, 页码 1359-1367

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1104/pp.004788

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Photoinhibition of photosystem 11 was studied in vivo with bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) plants grown in the presence of 0.3 (control), 4, or 15 muM Cu2+. Although photoinhibition, measured in the presence of lincomycin to block concurrent recovery, is faster in leaves of Cu2+-treated plants than in control leaves, thylakoids isolated from Cu-treated plants did not show high sensitivity to photoinhibition. Direct effects of excess Cu2+ on chloroplast metabolism are actually unlikely, because the Cu concentration of chloroplasts of Cu-treated plants was lower than that of their leaves. Excess Cu in the growth medium did not cause severe oxidative stress, collapse of antioxidative defenses, or loss of photoprotection. Thus, these hypothetical effects can be eliminated as causes for Cu-enhanced photoinhibition in intact leaves. However, Cu treatment lowered the leaf chlorophyll (Chl) concentration and reduced the thylakoid membrane network. The loss of Chl and sensitivity to photoinhibition could be overcome by adding excess Fe together with excess Cu to the growth medium. The addition of Fe lowered the Cu2+ concentration of the leaves, suggesting that Cu outcompetes Fe in Fe uptake. We suggest that the reduction of leaf Chl concentration, caused by the Cu-induced iron deficiency, causes the high photosensitivity of photosystem 11 in Cu2+-treated plants. A causal relationship between the susceptibility to photoinhibition and the leaf optical density was established in several plant species. Plant species adapted to high-light habitats apparently benefit from thick leaves because the rate of photoinhibition is directly proportional to light intensity, but photosynthesis becomes saturated by moderate light.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据