4.6 Article

Regulatory T cells and IL-10 levels are reduced in patients with vulnerable coronary plaques

期刊

ATHEROSCLEROSIS
卷 222, 期 2, 页码 519-523

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2012.03.016

关键词

T regulatory cells; IL-10; Inflammation; Atherosclerosis; Vulnerable plaque; Acute coronary syndrome

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Despite having a similar large extent of atherosclerotic coronary affliction, some patients suffer of recurrent cardiac events, whereas others remain asymptomatic. Hypothesis: We hypothesized the existence of a systemic signature that could distinguish vulnerable patients with preexisting coronary atherosclerosis from those having similar risk factors and atheromatous burden, but no history of clinically evident plaque rupture/erosion. Methods: Twenty three patients who had at least two prior myocardial infarctions (vulnerable group) were matched in respect to their background and coronary atherosclerosis extent with twenty one patients without a history of previous myocardial infarction who underwent routine coronary angiography before valvular surgery. We studied a panel of cytokines, antibodies and hormones including IL-6, IL-10, IL-12, antibodies to beta 2 glycoprotein I (beta 2GPI), antibodies to oxidized-LDL, adiponectin and resistin, along with levels of circulating EPCs and Tregs. Results: A significantly higher level of Treg cells was present in the control (73.4% + 4) than in the vulnerable patient group (62.2% +/- 10.7), p<0.001. IL-10 level was also significantly higher in the control than in the vulnerable patients (2.6 +/- 1.2 pg/ml versus 0.9 +/- 0.1 pg/ml respectively, p = 0.03). There was no significant difference in the circulating levels of the other cytokines, hormones or EPCs between the two groups. Conclusion: Regulatory T cells and serum IL-10 may discriminate vulnerable versus stable patients and may have a protective role against plaque rupture in patients with coronary atherosclerosis. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据