4.7 Article

Effects of streptozotocin-induced diabetes on markers of skeletal muscle metabolism and monocarboxylate transporter 1 to monocarboxylate transporter 4 transporters

期刊

METABOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL
卷 51, 期 7, 页码 807-813

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO
DOI: 10.1053/meta.2002.33343

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diabetes is known to alter both oxidative and glycolytic pathways in a fiber type-dependent manner. In various skeletal muscles of normal rats, monocarboxylate transporter 1 (MCT1) has been found to be highly correlated to lactate uptake, as well as to oxidative capacity, whereas the distribution and characteristics of MCT4 make it a good candidate for the extrusion of lactic acid from glycolytic muscle cells. Since a previous study found decreased sarcolemmal lactate uptake in streptozotocin (STZ)-diabetic rats, we investigated the presence of MCT1 in relation to enzymatic markers of both oxidative and glycolytic pathways, as well as MCT4 content, in STZ-diabetic rats. Soleus (SOL), red tibialis anterior (RTA), extensor digitorus longus (EDL), heart, and preparations of purified sarcolemmal vesicles (SV) from control and STZ-diabetic rats were harvested for MCT1 and MCT4 content, citrate synthase activity (CS), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) isozymes. Basal blood lactate concentration was increased by 38% in the diabetic rats (close to 1.91 mmol/L). However, no change was found in either MCT1 or MCT4 content in these rats. The diabetic rats presented fiber type-specific decrease in CS activity. We noted a redistribution in LDH isozymes in diabetic muscles with a general increase in type H-LDH. Regression analyses indicated (1) a strong relationship between LDH-4 and LDH-5 and (2) MCT1 was still correlated with CS activity in diabetic muscles. These results suggest that diabetes-induced hyperlactatemia is not associated with changes in MCT1 or MCT4 expression, but with alterations of oxidative and glycolytic enzymes. Copyright 2002, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据