4.6 Review

Role of hemodynamic shear stress in cardiovascular disease

期刊

ATHEROSCLEROSIS
卷 214, 期 2, 页码 249-256

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2010.09.008

关键词

Hemodynamic shear stress; Coronary atherosclerosis; Peripheral atherosclerosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Atherosclerosis is the main cause of morbidity and mortality in the Western world. Inflammation and blood flow alterations are new markers emerging as possible determinants for the development of atherosclerotic lesions. In particular, blood flow exerts a shear stress on vessel walls that alters cell physiology. Shear stress arises from the friction between two virtual layers of a fluid and is induced by the difference in motion and viscosity between these layers. Regions of the arterial tree with uniform geometry are exposed to a unidirectional and constant flow, which determines a physiologic shear stress, while arches and bifurcations are exposed to an oscillatory and disturbed flow, which determines a low shear stress. Atherosclerotic lesions develop mainly in areas of low shear stress, while those exposed to a physiologic shear stress are protected. The presence of areas of the arterial tree with different wall shear stress may explain, in part, the different localization of atherosclerotic lesions in both coronary and extra-coronary arteries. The measurement of this parameter may help in identifying atherosclerotic plaques at higher risk as well as in evaluating the efficacy of different pharmacological interventions. Moreover, an altered shear stress is associated with the occurrence of both aortic and intracranial aneurysms, possibly leading to their growth and rupture. Finally, the evaluation of shear stress may be useful for predicting the risk of developing restenosis after coronary and peripheral angioplasty and for devising a coronary stent with a strut design less thrombogenic and more conducive to endothelization. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据