4.6 Article

Hypocholesterolemia, foam cell accumulation, but no atherosclerosis in mice lacking ABC-transporter A1 and scavenger receptor BI

期刊

ATHEROSCLEROSIS
卷 218, 期 2, 页码 314-322

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.07.096

关键词

ABCA1; SR-BI; Reverse cholesterol transport

资金

  1. Netherlands Heart Foundation [2001T4101, 2008T070, 2007T056]
  2. Dutch Digestive Foundation [04-55]
  3. Catalan University
  4. Research Grants Management Agency (Beatriu de Pinos)
  5. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research [917.66.301]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High-density lipoprotein (HDL) mediated reverse cholesterol transport (RCT) is regarded to be crucial for prevention of foam cell formation and atherosclerosis. ABC-transporter A1 (ABCA1) and scavenger receptor BI (SR-BI) are involved in the biogenesis of HDL and the selective delivery of HDL cholesterol to the liver, respectively. In the present study, we phenotypically characterized mice lacking these two proteins essential for HDL metabolism. ABCA1 x SR-BI double knockout (dKO) mice showed severe hypocholesterolemia mainly due to HDL loss, despite a 90% reduction of HDL cholesterol uptake by liver. VLDL production was increased in dKO mice. However, non-HDL cholesterol levels were reduced, probably due to enhanced clearance via LRP1. Hepatobiliary cholesterol transport and fecal sterol excretion were not impaired in dKO mice. In contrast, the macrophage RCT in dKO mice was markedly impaired as compared to WT mice, associated with the accumulation of macrophage foam cells in the lung and Peyer's patches. Strikingly, no atherosclerotic lesion formation was observed in dKO mice. In conclusion, both ABCA1 and SR-BI are essential for maintaining a properly functioning HDL-mediated macrophage RCT, while the potential anti-atherosclerotic functions of ABCA1 and SR-BI are not evident in dKO mice due to the absence of pro-atherogenic lipoproteins. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据