4.6 Article

Circulating vaspin levels and epicardial adipose tissue thickness are associated with impaired coronary flow reserve in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

期刊

ATHEROSCLEROSIS
卷 217, 期 1, 页码 125-129

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.03.026

关键词

Biomarkers; Epicardial fat thickness; Coronary flow reserve; Adipokines; Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) have a reduced coronary flow reserve (CFR) and an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. The fat cells that surround coronary arteries may play a central and underrecognized role in development of cardiovascular disease through the systemic secretion of adipokines. We therefore evaluated the relation of epicardial fat thickness, serum levels of epicardial fat-related adipokines (chemerin and vaspin), and CFR in patients with NAFLD. Methods: We investigated 54 patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD and 56 age- and sex-matched controls. CFR and epicardial fat thickness (EFT) were measured by transthoracic echocardiography. Serum levels of chemerin and vaspin were measured by ELISA. Results: EFT was significantly higher (0.64 +/- 0.13 vs. 0.54 +/- 0.10 cm, P < 0.001) and CFR significantly lower (2.11 +/- 0.45 vs. 2.52 +/- 0.62, P < 0.001) in patients with NAFLD than in controls. Serum levels of vaspin and chemerin were both significantly increased in patients with NAFLD compared with controls. Stepwise regression analysis showed that EFT (beta = -0.53, t = -3.7, P < 0.001), serum vaspin levels (beta = -0.30, t = -2.5, P = 0.014), and liver fibrosis (beta = -0.31, t = -2.11, P = 0.041), in the order they entered into the model, were independent predictors of CFR in NAFLD patients. Conclusion: Our data suggest the presence of a complex interplay between EFT, serum vaspin, and liver histology in promoting an impaired hyperemic stimulation of coronary blood flow in patients with NAFLD. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据