4.5 Article

Subchronic toxicity studies on perfluorooctanesulfonate potassium salt in cynomolgus monkeys

期刊

TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 68, 期 1, 页码 249-264

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/68.1.249

关键词

perfluorooctanesulfonate; cholesterol; hypolipidemia; peroxisomes; hepatotoxicity; electron microscopy; primate

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study was conducted to determine the earliest measurable response of primates to low-level perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) exposure and to provide information to reduce uncertainty in human health risk assessment. Groups of male and female monkeys received 0, 0.03, 0.15, or 0.75 mg/kg/day potassium PFOS orally for 182 days. Recovery animals from each group, except the 0.03 mg/kg/day dose group, were monitored for one year after treatment. Significant adverse effects occurred only in the 0.75 mg/kg/day dose group and included compound-related mortality in 2 of 6 male monkeys, decreased body weights, increased liver weights, lowered serum total cholesterol, lowered triiodothyronine concentrations (without evidence of hypothyroidism), and lowered estradiol levels. Decreased serum total cholesterol occurred in the 0.75 mg/kg/day dose group at serum PFOS levels > 100 ppm. Hepatocellular hypertrophy and lipid vacuolation were present at term in the 0.75 mg/kg/day dose group. No peroxisomal (palmitoyl CoA oxidase) or cell proliferation (proliferating cell nuclear antigen immunohistochemistry) was detected. Complete reversal of clinical and hepatic effects and significant decreases in serum and liver PFOS occurred within 211 days posttreatment. Liver-to-serum PFOS ratios were comparable in all dose groups, with a range of 1:1 to 2:1. Serum concentrations associated with no adverse effects (0.15 mg/kg/day) were 82.6 +/- 25.2 ppm for males and 66.8 +/- 10.8 ppm for females. Comparison of serum PFOS concentrations associated with no adverse effect in this study to those reported in human blood samples (0.028 +/- 0.014 ppm) indicated an adequate margin of safety.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据