4.7 Article

Identifying and characterizing plastidic 2-oxoglutarate/malate and dicarboxylate transporters in Arabidopsis thaliana

期刊

PLANT AND CELL PHYSIOLOGY
卷 43, 期 7, 页码 706-717

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/pcp/pcf109

关键词

Arabidopsis thaliana; dicarboxylate transporter; oxaloacetate transporter; 2-oxoglutarate/malate transporter; plastid

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We characterized three Arabidopsis genes, AtpOMT1, AtpDCT1 and AtpDCT2, localized on chromosome 5 and homologous to spinach chloroplastic 2-oxoglutarate/malate transporter (OMT) gene. The yeast-expressed recombinant AtpOMT1 protein transported malate and 2-oxoglutarate but not glutamate. By contrast, the recombinant AtpDCT1 protein transported 2-oxoglutarate and glutamate at similar affinities in exchange for malate. These findings suggested that AtpOMT1 is OMT and AtpDCT1 is a general dicarboxylate transporter (DCT). The recombinant proteins could also transport oxaloacetate at the same binding sites for dicarboxylates. In particular, the AtpOMT1 had a K-m value for oxaloacetate one order of magnitude lower than those for malate and 2-oxoglutarate. Although the transcripts for the three genes were accumulated in all tissues examined, the expression of the genes in leaf tissues was light inducible. The expression of the three genes was also induced by nitrate supplement but the induction was most prominent and transient in AtpOMT1 similar to nitrate reductase gene. These findings lead to a proposition that AtpOMT1 functions as an oxaloacetate transporter in the malate-oxaloacetate shuttle across chloroplast membranes. We identified T-DNA insertional mutants of AtpOMT1 and AtpDCT1. Although the AtpOMT1 mutants could grow normally in normal air, the AtpDCT1 mutants were non-viable under the same conditions. The AtpDCT1 mutants were able to grow under the high CO2 condition to suppress photorespiration. These findings suggested that at least AtpDCT1 is a necessary component for photorespiratory nitrogen recycling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据