4.6 Article

The prevalence and predictors of psychological distress in patients with early localized prostate cancer

期刊

BJU INTERNATIONAL
卷 90, 期 1, 页码 56-61

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410X.2002.02806.x

关键词

early prostate cancer; diagnosis; mental health; depression; anxiety; psychopathology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To determine the level of psychopathology. traumatic distress and quality of life in men with newly diagnosed clinically localized prostate cancer. the effect on these of a consultation in a combined-specialist early-prostate clinic, and predictors of psychopathology. Patients and methods Eighty-eight patients were recruited front the combined clinic: they completed a battery of questionnaires including the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). the revised Impact of Event Scale (IES) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, before their first appointment. Two weeks later they completed the HADS. ITS and a patient-satisfaction survey. Results The overall level of psychopathology varied among the questionnaires used. from 0% on the HADS depression scale, 8% on the HADS anxiety scale and 14% on the IES. Anxiety and traumatic stress symptoms were commoner than depressive symptoms. The quality-of-life scores showed a relatively good level of functioning, Pre-morbid factors and disease status did not predict psychological distress. Younger age was mildly predictive of poorer psychological functioning. Anxiety symptoms reduced slightly after a joint clinic appointment, whereas depressive symptoms showed a slight increase. Conclusion This study suggests that men with early localized prostate cancer have low levels of psychopathology overall, However. some men experience distressing psychological symptoms and it is important that future research is conducted to help develop clear guidelines on the optimal methods of detecting and managing men with prostate cancer who have mental health difficulties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据