4.5 Article

Adherent endotoxin mediates biological responses of titanium particles without stimulating their phagocytosis

期刊

JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH
卷 20, 期 4, 页码 696-703

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1016/S0736-0266(01)00176-0

关键词

confocal microscopy; endotoxin; fluorescence microscopy; osteolysis; phagocytosis; wear particles

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL33849] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAMS NIH HHS [AR43769] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aseptic loosen in Q of orthopaedic implants is thought to be primarily due to stimulation of cytokine production by wear particles from the implants. The cytokines increase osteoclast differentiation, leading to osteolysis and implant loosening, Accumulating evidence indicates that adherent endotoxin mediates the biological responses induced by the car particles. One mechanism by which adherent endotoxin may act is by increasing phagocytosis of the ear particles. To test this hypothesis, the effect of adherent endotoxin on phagocytosis of titanium particles was determined. First. we developed reliable confocal and fluorescence microscopy methods to examine both the attachment and internalization steps of phagocytosis. Use of these methods showed that adherent endotoxin does not detectably alter the rate or the extent of phagocytosis of titanium particles by RAW 264,7 cells. Despite this lack of an effect on phagocytosis. adherent endotoxin dramatically increases the ability of RAW 264.7 cells to produce TNF-alpha and induce osteoclast differentiation. Thus, adherent endotoxin mediates these biological responses by a mechanism that does not rely on increased phagocytosis. These results also demonstrate that phagocytosis is not sufficient to induce cytokine production and osteoclast differentiation but do not rule out the possibility that phagocytosis is required for induction of these responses by titanium particles with adherent endotoxin. (C) 2002 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据