4.6 Article

Serum uric acid levels predict the severity and morphology of coronary atherosclerosis detected by multidetector computed tomography

期刊

ATHEROSCLEROSIS
卷 213, 期 1, 页码 178-183

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2010.08.077

关键词

Coronary atherosclerosis; Serum uric acid; Multidetector computed tomography

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we aimed to evaluate whether serum uric acid (UA) was associated with the severity and morphology of coronary atherosclerotic plaques (CAP) shown by multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). The study population consisted of 982 patients (58% men) who underwent dual-source 64 slice MDCT for the assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD). Coronary arteries were evaluated on 16 segment basis and critical coronary plaque was described as luminal narrowing >50%, whereas plaque morphology was assessed on per segment basis. Serum UA levels were determined using commercially available assay kits. The critical atherosclerotic lesions were detected in 454/982 (46.2%) subjects by MDCT. Serum UA levels were found to be higher in patients with any coronary plaque (6.9 +/- 1.5 mg/dL vs. 5.1 +/- 1.3 mg/dL, p < 0.01). Also UA level was higher in patients with critical stenosis compared to non-critical stenosis (6.1 +/- 1.5 mg/dL vs. 5.4 +/- 1.3 mg/dL, p < 0.001). Subjects having primarily calcified plaques have higher UAlevels compared to other plaque subtypes (5.5 +/- 1.3 for non-calcified plaques, and 5.6 +/- 1.2 for mixed plaques, 6.6 +/- 1.6 for calcified plaques, p < 0.001). This independent association was remained after multinominal regression analysis (OR: 1,987; 95% CI; 1.69-2.32; p < 0.01). Our study demonstrated that serum UA level was significantly associated with the severity and the calcified morphology of CAP detected by MDCT. Further prospective clinical studies are needed to clarify the exact physiopathologic role of UA in CAD. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据