4.6 Article

Fibroblast growth factor-2 transiently activates the p53 oncosuppressor protein in human primary vascular smooth muscle cells: Implications for atherogenesis

期刊

ATHEROSCLEROSIS
卷 210, 期 2, 页码 400-406

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2010.01.006

关键词

FGF-2; p53/HDM2; VSMC; Atherosclerosis

资金

  1. Italian Ministries of Health and Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The development of atherosclerotic lesions associates with the proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC), and their migration from arterial tunica media to the intima. Fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-2 can trigger either phenomena, which are accompanied by the functional impairment of the p53 transcription factor. However, FGF-2 impact on p53 function in VSMC is largely unknown. Methods and results: RT-PCR and Western blot analyses assayed FGF-2 effect on human primary VSMC expression of p53-induced molecules with a role in atherogenesis. Confocal microscopy evaluated whether FGF-2 could affect p53 distribution inside VSMC. Results indicate that VSMC exposure to FGF-2 at amounts stimulating the proliferation and migration of these cells promotes p53 phosphorylation and transient accumulation in VSMC nuclei. This is followed by an increase in the expression of the p53-induced thrombospondin (TSP)-1, a VSMC growth and motility factor, and human double minute 2 (HDM2), an antagonist of p53 transcriptional and growth suppressive activity. At later time points, in agreement with the increase of HDM2 and with the capability of this protein to export nuclear p53 to the cytoplasm, the content of p53 in VSMC nuclei is reduced, and the expression of the p53-targeted TSP-l and HDM2 is diminished. Conclusions: Since FGF-2, p53, TSP-1, and HDM2 are expressed in human atherosclerotic lesions, the in vitro effects of FGF-2 described herein may be operative in vivo, providing a molecular mechanism for FGF-2 pro-atherogenic activity. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据