4.5 Article

Features of stimulation affecting tonal-speech perception: Implications for cochlear prostheses

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA
卷 112, 期 1, 页码 247-258

出版社

ACOUSTICAL SOC AMER AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1121/1.1487843

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIDCD NIH HHS [F32 DC000470, F32 DC00470, R01 DC03808, R01 DC003808, T32 DC000011, T32 DC00011] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tone languages differ from English in that the pitch pattern of a single-syllable word conveys lexical meaning. In the present study, dependence of tonal-speech perception on features of the stimulation was examined using an acoustic simulation of a CIS-type speech-processing strategy for cochlear prostheses. Contributions of spectral features of the speech signals were assessed by varying the number of filter bands, while contributions of temporal envelope features were assessed by varying the low-pass cutoff frequency used for extracting the amplitude envelopes. Ten normal-hearing native Mandarin Chinese speakers were tested. When the low-pass cutoff frequency was fixed at 512 Hz, consonant, vowel, and sentence recognition improved as a function of the number of channels and reached plateau at 4 to 6 channels. Subjective judgments of sound quality continued to improve as the number of channels increased to 12, the highest number tested. Tone recognition, i.e., recognition of the four Mandarin tone patterns, depended on both the number of channels and the low-pass cutoff frequency. The trade-off between the temporal and spectral cues for tone recognition indicates that temporal cues can compensate for diminished spectral cues for tone recognition and vice versa. An additional tone recognition experiment using syllables of equal duration showed a marked decrease in performance, indicating that duration cues contribute to Lone recognition. A third experiment showed that recognition of processed FM patterns that mimic Mandarin tone patterns was poor when temporal envelope and duration cues were removed. (C) 2002 Acoustical Society of America.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据