4.6 Article

The association between erectile dysfunction and peripheral arterial disease as determined by screening ankle-brachial index testing

期刊

ATHEROSCLEROSIS
卷 207, 期 2, 页码 440-444

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2009.05.005

关键词

Peripheral vascular disease; Erectile dysfunction; Nitric oxide; Atherosclerosis

资金

  1. Pfizer Pharmaceuticals

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a potent marker of adverse cardiovascular prognosis, yet PAD frequently remains asymptomatic or undiagnosed. Erectile dysfunction (ED) has been associated with atherosclerosis, but whether ED is an independent predictor of PAD is unknown. We hypothesized that ED is a marker for previously undiagnosed PAD, and thus ED may identify men who would benefit from screening ankle-brachial index (ABI). Methods: 690 male patients (pts) who had been referred for stress testing, and were without known PAD were prospectively screened for ED and PAD, using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire, and ABI, respectively. ED was defined by a score of <= 25 on the ED domain of the IIEF, PAD was defined as an ABI <= 0.9. Results: ED was present in 45% of pts and PAD was present in 23%. Of pts found to have PAD, 66% reported no lower extremity symptoms. Men with ED were found to have significantly more PAD than men without ED (32% vs. 16%, p < 0.01), and there was a stepwise increase in the prevalence of PAD with increasing ED severity (28% of men with mild ED, 33% with moderate ED, 40% with severe ED, p < 0.001). On multivariate logistic regression analysis ED (OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.32-2.94, p = 0.002), was an independent predictor of PAD. Conclusions: In men referred for stress testing, erectile dysfunction is an independent predictor of PAD as determined by screening ABI examination, and increasing severity of ED is associated with increasing prevalence of PAD. These results suggest that men with ED might be targeted for screening ABI evaluation. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据