4.6 Article

Differential effects of cross-sex hormonal treatment on plasma asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) in healthy male-to-female and female-to-male transsexuals

期刊

ATHEROSCLEROSIS
卷 206, 期 1, 页码 245-250

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2009.01.020

关键词

Amino acids; Asymmetric dimethylarginine; Sex hormones; Transsexuals

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Sex hormone administration affects plasma levels of the endogenous nitric oxide synthase inhibitor asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA). We investigated the effects of cross-sex hormone treatment (CHT) on plasma ADMA concentration in an open-label study in 40 male-to-female (M-F) and 14 female-to-male (F-M) transsexuals. Methods: M-F received (1) cyproterone acetate (CA) 50 mg bid (n = 10), (2) CA 50 mg bid + ethinyl estradiol (EE) 50 mu g bid (n = 15), or (3) CA 50 mg bid + transdermal estradiol (tE(2)) patches daily delivering 100 mu g 17 beta-estradiol (n = 15). F-M received 250 mg mixed testosterone esters intramuscularly every 2 weeks (n = 14). Results: All M-F treatment arms showed a decrease in plasma ADMA concentration after 16 weeks of CHT (mean percentage change from pre-treatment (95% confidence interval)): -26.2% (-30.9 to -21.5%) for EE + CA, -8.9% (-13.4 to -4.3%) for tE(2) + CA, and -11.3% (-17.4 to -5.2%) for CA. Testosterone administration to females increased ADMA by 9.4% (2.6 to 16.3%). The change in the EE + CA treated group was still significant after 52 weeks of CHT. In M-F and F-M, CHT had opposite effects on concentrations of other plasma amino acids as well, with EE + CA treatment causing a decrease and testosterone administration resulting in an increase. Conclusion: Administration of anti-androgens alone or combined with estrogens to males decreases and testosterone administration to females increases the plasma ADMA concentration, possibly reflecting a general effect of sex hormones on amino acid metabolism. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据