4.6 Article

Elevated alanine aminotransferase levels predict mortality from cardiovascular disease and diabetes in Koreans

期刊

ATHEROSCLEROSIS
卷 205, 期 2, 页码 533-537

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2008.12.012

关键词

Alanine aminotransferase; Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; Cardiovascular disease; Mortality

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Metabolic syndrome is associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is closely associated with metabolic syndrome. This study investigated the relationship between elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, as a proxy marker of NAFLD, and death from cardiovascular disease (CVD) or diabetes in a Korean population. Methods: The study population consisted of 37,085 patients who underwent health examinations at the Health Promotion Center of the Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, in 2000 and 2001. Individuals with viral hepatitis or alcoholic liver disease were excluded from the study. The relationship between baseline ALT levels and CVD- or diabetes-related mortality was determined for a median period of 5.0 years. Results: A total of 407 deaths occurred during the follow-up period, with 91 deaths resulting from CVD or diabetes. The multivariate relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for CVD- or diabetes-related mortality in patients with ALT levels > 40 IU/L were 2.26 (1.22-4.19). The multivariate RR and 95% CI for CVD- or diabetes-related mortality in patients with the highest quartile of ALT levels (>= 31 IU/L) were 2.28 (95% CI: 1.02-5.08) when the lowest quartile (<= 15 IU/L) was used as a reference. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that elevated ALT levels are independently associated with increased CVD- or diabetes-related mortality in Koreans. Thus, elevated ALT levels, as a marker for WILD, may serve as a surrogate predictor of CVD- or diabetes-related mortality among the Korean population. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据