4.6 Article

Indices of reverse cholesterol transport in subjects with metabolic syndrome after treatment with rosuvastatin

期刊

ATHEROSCLEROSIS
卷 197, 期 2, 页码 732-739

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2007.07.007

关键词

reverse cholesterol transport; cholesterol efflux; CETP; LCAT; rosuvastatin; HDL; metabolic syndrome

资金

  1. NIBIB NIH HHS [P41 EB-001975] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The effects of the statin, rosuvastatin on indices of reverse cholesterol transport were studied in a randomized, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial in 25 overweight subjects with defined metabolic syndrome. Result: Four weeks' treatment with 40 mg/day rosuvastatin significantly reduced levels of plasma cholesterol (44%), LDL cholesterol (60%) and triglyceride (38%). HDL cholesterol (mean [S.D.]) rose (0.97[0.17] to 1.05[0.17] mmol/L; P < 0.05) and the LpA-I component of HDL from 39[7] to 45[91 mg/dL (P < 0.05). LCAT activity fell (0.55[0.13] to 0.35[0.07] nmol/mL/h; P < 0.05); CETP activity and mass fell from 89[13] to 80[11] nmol//L/h and from 1.66[0.57] to 1.28[0.41] mu g/mL respectively, (P < 0.05). Cholesterol efflux in vitro (to plasmas from THP-1 activated cells) fell from 7.1[1.8]% (placebo) to 6.2[1.7]% (rosuvastatin); P < 0.05, but when plasmas depleted of apoB lipoproteins were studied, the difference in efflux was no longer statistically significant. During placebo efflux was paradoxically inversely correlated with HDL-C (P = 0.0 16) and LpA-I (P = 0.035) concentrations but these correlations were absent after rostivastatin. Conclusions: The data suggest possible HDL dysfunctionality in subjects with metabolic syndrome. The reduced capacity of plasmas following statin treatment to stimulate cholesterol efflux in vitro occurred in association with reduction in apoB lipoproteins and reduced activities of CETP and LCAT, and despite increased levels of HDL cholesterol. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据