4.6 Article

Lipocalin-type prostaglandin D synthase is a powerful biomarker for severity of stable coronary artery disease

期刊

ATHEROSCLEROSIS
卷 201, 期 2, 页码 385-391

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2008.03.010

关键词

Lipocalin-type prostaglandin D synthase; Prostaglandin D(2); Coronary artery disease; Atherosclerosis; Biomarker

资金

  1. Japan Science and Technology Corporation
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
  3. Japanese Government [12558078]
  4. Takeda Science Foundation
  5. Osaka City
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [12558078] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lipocalin-type prostaglandin D synthase (L-PGDS), which responsible for the biosynthesis of postaglandin (PG) D(2), has been fond to be present in the atherosclerotic plaque of the human coronary artery and also to be detectable in human serum. This multicenter cooperative Study was designed to establish the diagnostic value of measuring, scrum L-PGDS for coronary artery disease. The study included 1013 Consecutive patients suspected of having stable coronary artery disease who Underwent diagnostic coronary angiography. Peripheral blood was collected prior to angiography. The serum level Of L-PGDS. as determined by a sandwich ELISA, was 58.1 +/- 2.2, 62.0 +/- 1.8 and 80.6 +/- 2.6 mu g/dl for patients with no stenotic lesion (N, n = 241). single-vessel coronary artery disease (S, n = 351). and multi-vessel coronary artery disease ( M, n = 421). respectively (N vs. S; P < 0.001. S vs. M: P < 0.01, N vs. M: P < 0.001). Multiple regression analysis indicated that the most powerful independent predictor of the coronary severity score (Gensini Score) was the L-PGDS level (R = 0.55. P < 0.0001). The serum L-PGDS level is suitable to evaluate the severity of coronary artery disease. The measurement Of serum L-PGDS can be a strategy for screening of stable coronary artery disease prior to coronary angiography. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据