4.6 Article

The effect of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors on naturally occurring CD4(+)CD25(+) T cells

期刊

ATHEROSCLEROSIS
卷 197, 期 2, 页码 829-839

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2007.07.031

关键词

statins; atherosclerosis; T cells; immune response; Foxp3

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins) are in widespread use due to their LDL reducing properties and concomitant improvement of clinical outcome in patients with and without preexisting atherosclerosis. Considerable evidence suggests that immune mediated mechanisms play a dominant role in the beneficial effects of statins. Naturally occurring CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T cells (Tregs) have a key role in the prevention of various inflammatory and autoimmune disorders by suppressing immune responses. We tested the hypothesis that statins influence the circulating number and the functional properties of Tregs. We studied the effects of in vivo and in vitro statin treatment of human and murine mononuclear cells on the number of Tregs and the expression level of their master transcription regulator, Foxp3. Atorvastatin, but not mevastatin nor pravastatin, treatment of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) increased the number of CD4(+)CD25(high) cells, and CD4(+)CD25(+)Foxp3+ cells. These Tregs, induced by atorvastatin, expressed high levels of Foxp3, which correlated with an increased regulatory potential. Furthermore, co-culture studies revealed that atorvastatin induced CD4(+)CD25(+)Foxp3(+) Tregs were derived from peripheral CD4(+)CD25(-)Foxp3(-) cells. Simvastatin and pravastatin treatment in hyperlipidemic subjects increased the number of Tregs. In C57BL/6 mice however, no effect of statins on Tregs was evident. In conclusion, statins appear to significantly influence the peripheral pool of Tregs in humans. This finding may shed light on the mechanisms governing the plaque stabilizing properties of statins.(c) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据