4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

The cosmological constant problem and quintessence

期刊

CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM GRAVITY
卷 19, 期 13, 页码 3435-3448

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0264-9381/19/13/304

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

I briefly review the cosmological constant problem and the issue of dark energy (or quintessence). Within the framework of quantum field theory, the vacuum expectation value of the energy momentum tensor formally diverges as k(4). A cutoff at the Planck or electroweak scale leads to a cosmological constant which is, respectively, 10(123) or 10(55) times larger than the observed value, Lambda/8piG similar or equal to 10(-47) GeV4. The absence of a fundamental symmetry which could set the value of A to either zero or a very small value leads to the cosmological constant problem. Most cosmological scenarios favour a large time-dependent Lambda-term in the past (in order to generate inflation at z much greater than 10(10)), and a small Lambda-term today, to account for the current acceleration of the universe at z less than or similar to 1. Constraints arising from cosmological nucleosynthesis, CMB and structure formation constrain A to be sub-dominant during most of the intermediate epoch 10(10) < z < 1. This leads to the cosmic coincidence conundrum which suggests that the acceleration of the universe is a recent phenomenon and that we live during a special epoch when the density in A and in matter are almost equal. Time varying models of dark energy can, to a certain extent, ameliorate the fine-tuning problem (faced by Lambda), but do not resolve the puzzle of cosmic coincidence. I briefly review tracker models of dark energy, as well as more recent brane inspired ideas and the issue of horizons in an accelerating universe. Model independent methods which reconstruct the cosmic equation of state from supernova observations are also assessed. Finally, a new diagnostic of dark energy-statefinder-is discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据