4.8 Article

Slow exchange in the chromophore of a green fluorescent protein variant

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 124, 期 27, 页码 7932-7942

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja0257725

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Green fluorescent protein and its mutants have become valuable tools in molecular biology. They also provide systems rich in photophysical and photochemical phenomena of which an understanding is important for the development of new and optimized variants of GFP. Surprisingly, not a single NMR study has been reported on GFPs until now, possibly because of their high tendency to aggregate. Here, we report the F-19 nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) studies on mutants of the green fluorescent protein (GFP) and cyan fluorescent protein (CFP) labeled with fluorinated tryptophans that enabled the detection of slow molecular motions in these proteins. The concerted use of dynamic NMR and F-19 relaxation measurements, supported by temperature, concentration- and folding-dependent experiments provides direct evidence for the existence of a slow exchange process between two different conformational states of CFP. F-19 NMR relaxation and line shape analysis indicate that the time scale of exchange between these states is in the range of 1.2-1.4 ms. Thermodynamic analysis revealed a difference in enthalpy DeltaH(0) = (18.2 +/- 3.8) kJ/mol and entropy TDeltaS(0) = (19.6 +/- 1.2) kJ/mol at T = 303 K for the two states involved in the exchange process, indicating an entropy-enthalpy compensation. The free energy of activation was estimated to be approximately 60 kJ/mol. Exchange between two conformations, either of the chromophore itself or more likely of the closely related histidine 148, is suggested to be the structural process underlying the conformational mobility of GFPs. The possibility to generate a series of single-atom exchanges (atomic mutations) like H --> F in this study offers a useful approach for characterizing and quantifying dynamic processes in proteins by NMR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据