4.4 Article

Significance of peptidoglycan, a proinflammatory bacterial antigen in atherosclerotic arteries and its association with vulnerable plaques

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 90, 期 2, 页码 119-123

出版社

EXCERPTA MEDICA INC-ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9149(02)02432-3

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Peptidoglycan (PG) is a major component of the cell wall of gram-positive bacteria that is abundantly present in all human mucosa. PG is a functional lipopolysaccharide analog that binds to CD14 on macrophages and induces proinflammatory cytokine production and metalloproteinases. We investigated the hypothesis that bacterial PG is present in atherosclerotic tissue. In addition, plaque phenotypes were characterized in relation to presence of PG. Immunohistology of carotid (n = 15) and femoral (n = 6) endarterectomy specimens revealed the presence of PG in the cytoplasm of cells located in plaques. PG was detected in 14 of 15 carotid arteries and 5 of 6 femoral arteries. From the 14 coronary arteries,, 31 atherosclerotic segments were selected.. PG was detected within 19 of 31 of these coronary segments. Western, blot demonstrated the presence of the toll-like receptor (TLR-2), the co-receptor for PG, in coronary artery tissue. The number of PG-containing cells in coronary arteries was significantly higher when the histologic features of plaque vulnerability were evident. Inflammation of the cap or shoulder was observed in 11 of 19 PG-positive versus 2 of 12 PG-negative segments (p = 0.023). More than 50% of the plaque area consisted of atheroma in 7 of 19 PG-positive segments and 0 of 12 PG-negative segments (p = 0.025). Heavy smooth muscle cell staining occurred in the plaque cap and shoulder in 3 of 19 PG-positive segments versus 9 of 12 PG-negative segments. Proinflammatory bacterial PG and its co-receptor have been observed in atherosclerotic arteries, in association with the vulnerable plaque phenotype. (C) 2002 by Excerpta Medica, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据