4.6 Article

Two-electron reduction of quinones by Enterobacter cloacae NAD(P)H:nitroreductase:: quantitative structure-activity relationships

期刊

ARCHIVES OF BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS
卷 403, 期 2, 页码 249-258

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0003-9861(02)00228-X

关键词

nitroreductase; quinones; electron transfer; mechanism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Enterobacter cloacae NAD(P)H:nitroreductase (NR; EC 1.6.99.7) catalyzes two-electron reduction of a series of quinoidal compounds according to a ping-pong scheme, with marked substrate inhibition by quinones. The steady-state catalytic constants (k(cat)) range from 0.1 to 1600 s(-1), and bimolecular rate constants (k(cat)/K-m) range from 10(3) to 10(8) M-1 s(-1). Quinones, nitroaromatic compounds and competitive to NADH inhibitor dicumarol, quench the flavin mononucleotide (FMN) fluorescence of nitroreductase. The reactivity of NR with single-electron acceptors is consistent with an outer-sphere electron transfer model, taking into account high potential of FMN semiquinone/FMNH- couple and good solvent accessibility of FMN. However, the single-electron acceptor 1,1'-dibenzyl-4,4'-bipyridinium was far less reactive than quinones possessing similar single-electron reduction potentials (E1). For all quinoidal compounds except 2-hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinones, there existed parabolic correlations between the log of rate constants of quinone reduction and their El or hydride-transfer potential (E-7 (Q/QH(-))). Based on pH dependence of rate constants, a single-step hydride transfer seems to be a more feasible quinone reduction mechanism. The reactivities of 2-hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinones were much higher than expected from their reduction potential. Most probably, their enhanced reactivity was determined by their binding at or close to the binding site of NADH and dicumarol, whereas other quinones used the alternative, currently unidentified binding site. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据