4.7 Article

Motor cortex activation is related to force of squeezing

期刊

HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING
卷 16, 期 4, 页码 197-205

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.10040

关键词

functional MRI; grip force; human; dynamometer; motor cortex

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Primate studies have demonstrated that motor cortex neurons show increased activity with increased force of movement. In humans, this relationship has received little study during a power grip such as squeezing, and has previously only been evaluated across a narrow range of forces. Functional MRI was performed in eight healthy subjects who alternated between rest and right hand squeezing at one of three force levels. During scanning, motor performances were recorded using a dynamometer. At each force level, activation volume was measured within left sensorimotor cortex, right sensorimotor cortex, and a midline supplementary motor area. In left sensorimotor cortex, % signal change was also assessed. The range of force generated across the three force levels varied from 4.9 N to 276 N. In left sensorimotor cortex, activation volume increased significantly with greater force. The % signal change also increased with greater force and correlated closely with activation volume. In supplementary motor area, activation volume increased significantly with increasing force, but with greater intersubject variability. In right sensorimotor cortex, a trend for larger activation volumes with greater force did not reach significance. The laterality index, an expression of the relative degree of contralateral vs. ipsilateral sensorimotor cortex activation, did not change across the three force levels. Increased force of squeezing is associated with increased contralateral sensorimotor cortex and supplementary motor area activation. This relationship was found across the full spectrum of forces that the human hand is capable of generating. Use of a valid, reliable method for assessing motor behavior during functional MRI may be important to clinical applications. (C) 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据