4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

A randomized double-blind comparison of the effects of clomiphene citrate and the aromatase inhibitor letrozole on ovulatory function in normal women

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 78, 期 2, 页码 280-285

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0015-0282(02)03241-7

关键词

aromatase inhibitors; letrozole; clomiphene citrate; ovulation induction; infertility

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To evaluate the ovarian follicular dynamics of cycle modification with the aromatase inhibitor letrozole compared with clomiphene citrate in normal ovulatory women. Design: Randomized double-blind controlled trial. Setting: Tertiary care hospital. Patient(s): Nineteen ovulatory female volunteers, ages 18-35 years. Intervention(s): Subjects were monitored in one control cycle. Subjects then received either letrozole 2.5 mg daily or clomiphene citrate 50 mg daily on days 5-9 after menses. Main Outcome Measure(s): Number of mature follicles, endometrial thickness and endometrial pattern at ovulation, and follicular profiles of LH, FSH, and E-2. Result(s): The number of mature follicles at the LH surge in natural cycles was 1.0 with an exaggerated response seen for treatment both with clomiphene and letrozole. There was no difference in the endometrial thickness at midcycle during either the natural cycles or the medicated cycles. LH surges and spontaneous ovulation were documented in all natural and medicated cycles. When measured daily, follicular profiles of LH and FSH are similar between the groups in both the natural and medicated cycles. In the medicated cycles, clomiphene results in a significant increase in E-2 levels, while E-2 levels in letrozole-stimulated cycles appeared lower than in natural cycles. Conclusion(s): Transient inhibition of aromatase activity in the early follicular phase with the aromatase inhibitor letrozole results in stimulation of ovarian folliculogenesis similar to that seen with clomiphene citrate with no apparent adverse effect on endometrial thickness or pattern at midcycle.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据