4.5 Article

Regulation of syndecan-4 expression with mechanical stress during the development of angioplasty-induced intimal thickening

期刊

JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY
卷 36, 期 2, 页码 361-370

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1067/mva.2002.124364

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL57908, HL60903] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we postulated that acute mechanical strain of the arterial wall induces changes in syndecan-4 expression that in turn may modulate cellular events, which promote neointima formation. Correlative in vivo and in vitro studies were performed to determine whether: (1) balloon injury of the rat carotid artery induces spatially and temporally regulated changes in syndecan-4 messenger RNA (mRNA) and protein expression; (2) the application of biaxial mechanical strain to cultured vascular wall cells regulates the expression of syndecan-4 mRNA and protein and its cell surface distribution and surface shedding; and (3) shed syndecan-4 directly effects cell motility behavior. We observed that syndecan-4 mRNA and protein expression were regulated in a temporally and spatially specific manner, such that initial expression of syndecan-4 was localized to adventitial cells followed by later expression in the neointima. Notably, in vitro stimulation of isolated adventitial fibroblasts with a mechanical stretch protocol that was designed to mimic in vivo balloon injury produced a rapid increase in syndecan-4 (4.3-fold increase; P < .001) that was accompanied both by enhanced protein shedding and by the disassembly of focal adhesions. Also significant was that shed syndecan-4, induced with mechanically conditioned media, appeared to be responsible for a chemotactic response of adventitial fibroblasts (P = .005). These results indicate that mechanical strain tightly regulates syndecan-4 expression, which may, in part, provide a mechanism for the activation of myofibroblast migration from the tunica adventitia into the neointima.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据