4.5 Article

Sediment yield and storage variations in the Negron River catchment (South Western Parisian Basin, France) during the holocene period

期刊

EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS
卷 27, 期 9, 页码 991-1009

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/esp.388

关键词

sediment yield; sediment storage; Holocene; human impact; Parisian Basin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the Negron River catchment area (162 km(2)), surface-sediment stores are composed of periglacial calcareous 'greze' (5 x 10(6) t) and loess (21 X 10(6) t), and Holocene alluvium (12.6 x 10(6) t), peat (0.6 x 10(6) t) and colluvium (18.5 x 10(6) t). Seventy-five per cent of the Holocene sediments is stored along the thalwegs. Present net sediment yield, calculated from solid discharge at the Negron outlet, is low (0.6 t km(-2) a(-1)) due to the dominance of carbonate rocks in the catchment. Mean sediment yield during the Holocene period is 7.0 t km(-2) a(-1) from alluvium stores and 7.6 t km(-2) a(-1) from colluvium stores. Thus, the gross sediment yield during the Holocene period is about 18.7 t km(-2) a(-1) and the sediment delivery ratio 3 per cent. The yield considerably varies from one sub-basin to another (3.9 to 24.5 t km(-2) a(-1)) according to lithology: about 25 per cent and 50 per cent of initial stores of periglacial greze and loess respectively were reworked during the Holocene period. Sediment yield has increased by a factor of 6 in the last 1000 years, due to the development of agriculture. The very high rate of sediment storage on the slope during that period (88 per cent of the yield) can be accounted for by the formation of cultivation steps ('rideaux'). It is predicted that the current destruction of these steps will result in a sediment wave reaching the valley floors in the coming decades. Subboreal and Subatlantic sediments and pollen assemblages in the Taligny marsh, where one-third of the alluvium is stored, show the predominant influence of human activity during these periods in the Negron catchment. Copyright (C) 2002 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据