4.5 Article

Historical biogeography and the origin of stomatal distributions in Banksia and Dryandra (Proteaceae) based on their cpDNA phylogeny

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY
卷 89, 期 8, 页码 1311-1323

出版社

BOTANICAL SOC AMER INC
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.89.8.1311

关键词

Australia's Southwest Botanical Province; Banksia, Drvandra, historical biogeography; molecular systematics; pre-adaptation, sclerophylly, xeromorphy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Banksta and Dryandra have undergone extensive speciation and adaptive radiation, especially in Australia's isolated Southwest Botanical Province We derive a phylogeny for these groups based on cpDNA sequences and use it to reconstruct their historical biogeography and evolution of leaf traits thought to be adapted to drought and/or nutrient poverty. Slowly evolving regions (trnL intron, trnL/trnF spacer) are used to resolve large-scale relationships; faster evolving regions (rp116 intron, psbA/trnH and trnT/trnL spacers) are used to resolve relationships among closely related species. Banksta is paraphyletic with respect to Dryandra The lineage underwent a basal split into two clades (here named /Cryptostomata and /Phanerostomota), and four infrageneric taxa Supported by morphological cladistic analyses (series Spicigerae, Abietinae, Tetragonae, and Banksia) are not monophyletic Dispersal-vicariance analysis resolves a southwestern Australian origin for the lineage, with two later expansions to the east followed by vicariance events. Stomatal crypts arose with the /Cryptostomata, which is characterized by tough, long-lived leaves and common in southwestern Australia Sequestering of stomata also arose multiple times in /Phanerostomata, which is characterized by cotter, short-lived leaves and common in moister coastal areas, via inrolling of the margins of narrow leaves and restricting stomata to shallow pits The hypothesis that sclerophylly preadapted the plants to xeromorphy is supported in the case of shallow stomatal pits and deep stomatal crypts, but not narrow, needle-like leaves.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据