4.5 Article

Mapping the human translation elongation factor eEF1H complex using the yeast two-hybrid system

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL
卷 365, 期 -, 页码 669-676

出版社

PORTLAND PRESS
DOI: 10.1042/BJ20011681

关键词

isoform; protein-protein interaction; three-hybrid system

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In eukaryotes, the eukaryotic translation elongation factor eEF1A responsible for transporting amino-acylated tRNA to the ribosome forms a higher-order complex, eEF1H, with its guanine-nucleotide-exchange factor eEF1B. In metazoans, eEF1B consists of three subunits: eEF1Balpha, eEF1Bbeta and eEF1Bgamma. The first two subunits possess the nucleotide-exchange activity, whereas the role of the last remains poorly defined. In mammals, two active tissue-specific isoforms of eEF1A have been identified. The reason for this pattern of differential expression is unknown. Several models on the basis of in vitro experiments have been proposed for the macromolecular organization of the eEF1H complex. However, these models differ in various aspects. This might be due to the difficulties of handling, particularly the eEF1Bbeta and eEF1Bgamma subunits in vitro. Here, the human eEF1H complex is for the first time mapped using the yeast two-hybrid system, which is a powerful in vivo technique for analysing protein-protein interactions. The following complexes were observed: eEF1A1:eEF1Balpha, eEF1A1:eEF1Bbeta, eEF1Bbeta:eEF1Bbeta eEF1Balpha:eEF1Bgamma, eEF1Bbeta:eEF1Bgamma and eEF1Balpha:eEF1Bgamma:eEF1Bbeta where the last was observed using a three-hybrid approach. Surprisingly, eEF1A2 showed no or only little affinity for the guanine-nucleotide-exchange factors. Truncated versions of the subunits of eEF1B were used to orientate these subunits within the resulting model. The model unit is a pentamer composed of two molecules of eEF1A, each interacting with either eEF1Balpha or eEF1Bbeta held together by eEF1Bgamma. These units can dimerize via eEF1Bbeta. Our model is compared with other models, and structural as well as functional aspects of the model are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据