4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Pancreatitis-associated ascitic fluid induces hepatocyte death independent of local cytokines

期刊

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH
卷 106, 期 2, 页码 308-313

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1006/jsre.2002.6474

关键词

pancreatic ascites; liver injury; hepatocyte injury; cytokines; apoptosis; acute pancreatitis; multisystem organ failure

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction. Kupffer-cell-derived cytokines mediate liver injury, yet macrophage pacification does not abolish hepatocyte injury. We undertook this study to examine the role of pancreatitis-associated ascitic fluid (PAAF) in liver injury. Methods. Pathogen-free PAAF was perfused into healthy rat livers in situ for 60 min (n = 5, sham = 5, LPS = 5). AST, ALT, LDH, and TNF were measured in the effluent. Primary cultures of rat Kupffer cells or hepatocytes were treated with PAAF; AST, ALT, LDH, and TNF were measured and cell proliferation was determined by MTT assay. A hepatocyte human cell line (CCL-13) was treated with PAAF and apoptosis was measured by flow cytometry. Results. Liver perfusion with PAAF induced a >15-fold increase in AST/ALT/LDH (P < 0.001 PAAF vs sham), but not in TNF. In vitro, Kupffer cell viability was sharply reduced by PAAF in a dose-dependent manner; however, 5% PAAF (50% viability) did not induce TNF production from Kupffer cells. PAAF induced a multifold increase in AST/A.LT/LDH from fresh hepatocytes (P < 0.001 vs control), which was not attenuated by a protease inhibitor. The CCL-13 cell population was reduced to 15 +/- 2% of baseline by PAAF (P < 0.001 vs control), whereas elastase, trypsin, or TNF had no effect. PAAF increased the percentage of nonviable CCL-13 cells (78 +/- 4% vs 28 +/- 1%, P < 0.001 vs control). Neither protease inhibitor nor heat inactivation of PAAF altered this pattern of hepatocyte death. Conclusion. PAAF induces direct hepatocyte injury and death by heat-stable factors other than pancreatic enzymes but not via local production of Kupffer-cell-derived cytokines. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science (USA).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据