4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Tyrosine phosphorylation of the metabotropic glutamate receptor mGluR5 in striatal neurons

期刊

NEUROPHARMACOLOGY
卷 43, 期 2, 页码 161-173

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0028-3908(02)00113-2

关键词

metabotropic; mGluR; phosphorylation; striatum; Immunoprecipitation; neuronal culture

资金

  1. NIA NIH HHS [AG13617] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Protein phosphorylation, controlled by the coordinated actions of phosphatases and kinases, is an important regulatory mechanism in synaptic transmission and other neurophysiological processes. Ionotropic glutamate receptors are known targets of phosphorylation on serine, threonine and tyrosine residues, with functional consequences for cell excitability, plasticity and toxicity. While phosphorylation of metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) also impacts critical cellular processes, there has been no evidence for direct tyrosine phosphorylation of mGluRs. In the present study, anti-phosphotyrosine and specific mGluR antibodies were used to detect tyrosine-phosphorylated mGluRs in rat brain. In particular, we found that mGluR5 is an abundant phosphotyrosine protein in vivo as well as in primary striatal neurons and tissue slices in vitro. The protein phosphatase inhibitor pervanadate robustly increased the amount of tyrosine-phosphorylated mGluR5, suggesting the receptor is subject to an endogenous, active cycle of phosphorylation and dephosphorylation. Furthermore, NMDA treatment also increased the amount of tyrosine-phosphorylated mGluR5, suggesting these endogenous phosphorylation regulatory mechanisms can be used to mediate crosstalk between synaptic glutamate receptors. While mGluR5-stimulated phosphoinositide hydrolysis appears to be unaltered by pervanadate treatment, tyrosine phosphorylation of mGluR5 may be important in trafficking, anchoring, or signaling of the receptor through G protein-independent pathways. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据