4.5 Article

Synthesis of pegylated immunonanoparticles

期刊

PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH
卷 19, 期 8, 页码 1137-1143

出版社

KLUWER ACADEMIC/PLENUM PUBL
DOI: 10.1023/A:1019842024814

关键词

polyethylene glycol; maleimide; immunonanoparticle; monoclonal antibody; brain drug targeting

资金

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [T32-NS-07356] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose. This work describes the synthesis of pegylated immunonanoparticles by conjugation of an anti-transferrin receptor monoclonal antibody (MAb) to maleimide-grafted pegylated nanoparticles prepared from poly(lactic acid) (PLA) and a bi-functional polyethyleneglycol (PEG). Methods. Maleimide-PEG(3500)-PLA(40000) and methoxyPEG(2)600-PLA(4)0000 copolymers were synthesized by ring opening polymerization of L-lactide using stannous octoate as catalyst. Pegylated nanoparticles were prepared from these copolymers by a multiple emulsion/solvent evaporation method and thiolated OX26 MAb was conjugated through the maleimide function located at the distal end of the PEG spacer. The pegylated immunonanoparticles were characterized by quasi-elastic light scattering, gel permeation chromatography, turbidimetry assays, and transmission electron microscopy. Results. NMR spectroscopy confirmed the synthesis of both copolymers and the preservation of the maleimide function. The pegylated immunonanoparticles had an average diameter of 121 +/- 5 nm and appeared spherical by transmission electron microscopy. The number of OX26 MAb molecules conjugated per individual pegylated nanoparticle was 67 +/- 4. The MAb conjugated to the surface of the pegylated immunonanoparticle was visualized directly by electron microscopy using a conjugate of 10 nm gold and an anti-mouse immunoglobulin secondary antibody. Conclusion. Pegylated immunonanoparticles can be synthesized with bifunctional PEG derivatives that bridge the nanoparticle and the targeting MAb. This novel formulation may enable the targeted delivery of small molecules, protein drugs, and gene medicines.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据