4.6 Article

Linking photorespiration, monoterpenes and thermotolerance in Quercus

期刊

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
卷 155, 期 2, 页码 227-237

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00457.x

关键词

Fv : Fm; electron transport rate (ETR); photochemical reflectance index (PRI); alpha-pinene; limonene; fumigation; photorespiration; monoterpenes; thermotolerance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The functions of two important plant processes, photorespiration and monoterpene production remain controversial. Here, we investigated one possible function, that of protection of plants from photodamage at high temperatures. Fluorescence, reflectance, monoterpene concentrations and visual leaf damage were measured in Quercus ilex seedlings exposed to temperature increases from 25 to 50degreesC (in 5degreesC steps) under photorespiratory (21% O-2) or nonphotorespiratory (2% O-2) atmospheres, and under control or terpene fumigation conditions. Lower variable to maximum fluorescence ratio (Fv : Fm: potential photochemical efficiency of photosystem II, PSII) and electron transport rate (ETR) were found in nonphotorespiratory conditions at temperatures greater than 35degreesC. Monoterpene concentrations were also lower, and leaf damage greater, in the low O-2 atmospheres. Monoterpene fumigation, which increased the foliar terpene concentrations by two- to four-fold, increased the photochemical efficiency between 35degreesC and 50degreesC, and decreased leaf damage, only under the nonphotorespiratory conditions. These results provide evidence that: photorespiration decreases photodamage, especially at high temperatures; photorespiration increases monoterpene production; plants are able to acquire exogenous monoterpenes and the acquisition response to temperature follows the stomatal conductance response; and monoterpenes can replace photorespiration in protection from photodamage at high temperatures, possibly by scavenging oxygen-reactive species, but they do not provide additional thermotolerance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据