4.7 Article

The lower main sequence and mass function of the globular cluster Messier 4

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 574, 期 2, 页码 L151-L154

出版社

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/342527

关键词

globular clusters : individual (M4); stars : low-mass, brown dwarfs; stars : luminosity function, mass function; white dwarfs

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The deepest optical image ever in a globular star cluster, a Hubble Space Telescope 123 orbit exposure in a single field of Messier 4, was obtained in two filters (F606W, F814W) over a 10 week period in early 2001. A somewhat shallower image obtained in 1995 allowed us to select out cluster and field objects via their proper-motion displacement, resulting in remarkably clean color-magnitude diagrams that reach to V=30, I=28. The cluster main-sequence luminosity function contains very few stars fainter than M-V = 15.0, M-I = 11.8, which, in both filters, is more than 2 mag brighter than our limit. This is about the faintest luminosity seen among field Population II subdwarfs of the same metallicity. However, there remains a sprinkling of potential cluster stars to lower luminosity all the way down to our limiting magnitudes. These latter objects are significantly redder than any known metal-poor field subdwarf. Comparison with the current generation of theoretical stellar models implies that the masses of the lowest luminosity cluster stars observed are near 0.09 M-circle dot. We derive the mass function of the cluster in our field and find that it is very slowly rising toward the lowest masses with no convincing evidence of a turnover even below 0.1 M-circle dot. The formal slope between 0.65 and 0.09 M-circle dot is alpha = 0.75 (Salpeter of 2.35) with a 99% confidence interval of 0.55-1.05. A consistency check between these slopes and the number of observed cluster white dwarfs yields a range of possible conclusions, one of which is that we have indeed seen the termination of the white dwarf cooling sequence in M4.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据