4.6 Article

THE COSMIC INFRARED BACKGROUND EXPERIMENT (CIBER): A SOUNDING ROCKET PAYLOAD TO STUDY THE NEAR INFRARED EXTRAGALACTIC BACKGROUND LIGHT

期刊

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0067-0049/207/2/31

关键词

dark ages, reionization, first stars; diffuse radiation; infrared: diffuse background; instrumentation: spectrographs; space vehicles: instruments; zodiacal dust

资金

  1. NASA APRA [NNX07AI54G, NNG05WC18G, NNX07AG43G, NNX07AJ24G, NNX10AE12G]
  2. Jet Propulsion Laboratory's Director's Research and Development Fund
  3. NASA Postdoctoral Fellowship
  4. NSF CAREER award
  5. UCSD Hellman Faculty Fellowship
  6. JSPS Research Fellowship for Young Scientists
  7. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [13J10283] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Cosmic Infrared Background Experiment (CIBER) is a suite of four instruments designed to study the near infrared (IR) background light from above the Earth's atmosphere. The instrument package comprises two imaging telescopes designed to characterize spatial anisotropy in the extragalactic IR background caused by cosmological structure during the epoch of reionization, a low resolution spectrometer to measure the absolute spectrum of the extragalactic IR background, and a narrow band spectrometer optimized to measure the absolute brightness of the zodiacal light foreground. In this paper we describe the design and characterization of the CIBER payload. The detailed mechanical, cryogenic, and electrical design of the system are presented, including all system components common to the four instruments. We present the methods and equipment used to characterize the instruments before and after flight, and give a detailed description of CIBER's flight profile and configurations. CIBER is designed to be recoverable and has flown four times, with modifications to the payload having been informed by analysis of the first flight data. All four instruments performed to specifications during the subsequent flights, and the scientific data from these flights are currently being analyzed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据