4.6 Article

Origin of mobility enhancement by chemical treatment of gate-dielectric surface in organic thin-film transistors: Quantitative analyses of various limiting factors in pentacene thin films

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
卷 118, 期 17, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4935024

关键词

-

资金

  1. Global COE Program of Chiba University (Advanced School for Organic Electronics) under Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [21350099]
  3. Green Photonics Research Project of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21350099, 15K13954] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For the better performance of organic thin-film transistors (TFTs), gate-insulator surface treatments are often applied. However, the origin of mobility increase has not been well understood because mobility-limiting factors have not been compared quantitatively. In this work, we clarify the influence of gate-insulator surface treatments in pentacene thin-film transistors on the limiting factors of mobility, i.e., size of crystal-growth domain, crystallite size, HOMO-band-edge fluctuation, and carrier transport barrier at domain boundary. We quantitatively investigated these factors for pentacene TFTs with bare, hexamethyldisilazane-treated, and polyimide-coated SiO2 layers as gate dielectrics. By applying these surface treatments, size of crystal-growth domain increases but both crystallite size and HOMO-band-edge fluctuation remain unchanged. Analyzing the experimental results, we also show that the barrier height at the boundary between crystal-growth domains is not sensitive to the treatments. The results imply that the essential increase in mobility by these surface treatments is only due to the increase in size of crystal-growth domain or the decrease in the number of energy barriers at domain boundaries in the TFT channel. (C) 2015 AIP Publishing LLC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据