4.5 Article

PET imaging of the normal human auditory system: responses to speech in quiet and in background noise

期刊

HEARING RESEARCH
卷 170, 期 1-2, 页码 96-106

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-5955(02)00386-6

关键词

speech; noise; superior temporal gyrus; cerebellum; post-central gyrus; thalamus; superior frontal gyrus; attention; auditory pathway

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The neural mechanisms involved in listening to sentences, and then detecting and verbalizing a specific word are poorly understood, but most likely involve complex neural networks. We used positron emission tomography to identify the areas of the human brain that are activated when young, normal hearing males and females were asked to listen to a sentence and repeat the last word from the Speech in Noise (SPIN) test. Listening conditions were (1) Quiet, (2) Speech, (3) Noise, and (4) SPIN with stimuli presented monaurally to either the left ear or the right ear, The least difficult listening task, Speech. resulted in bilateral activation of superior and middle temporal gyrus and pre-central gyrus. The Noise and SPIN conditions activated many of the same regions as Speech alone plus additional sites within the cerebellum, thalamus and superior/middle frontal gyri, Comparison of the SPIN condition versus Speech revealed additional activation in the right anterior lobe of the cerebellum and right medial frontal gyrus, near the cingulate. None of the left ear-right ear stimulus comparison revealed any significant differences except For the SPIN condition that showed greater activation in the left superior temporal gyrus for stimuli presented to the right ear. No gender differences were observed. These results demonstrate that repeating the last word in a sentence activates mainly auditory and motor areas of the brain when Speech is presented, whereas more difficult tasks, such as SPIN or milti-talker Noise, activate linguistic, attentional, cognitive, working memory, and motor planning areas. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据