4.6 Article

THE COS-HALOS SURVEY: KECK LRIS AND MAGELLAN MagE OPTICAL SPECTROSCOPY

期刊

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0067-0049/198/1/3

关键词

galaxies: abundances; galaxies: distances and redshifts; galaxies: halos; intergalactic medium; quasars: absorption lines

资金

  1. NASA through Space Telescope Science Institute [GO11598]
  2. NASA [NAS 5-26555]
  3. W. M. Keck Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present high signal-to-noise optical spectra for 67 low-redshift (0.1 < z < 0.4) galaxies that lie within close projected distances (5 kpc < rho < 150 kpc) of 38 background UV-bright QSOs. The Keck LRIS and Magellan MagE data presented here are part of a survey that aims to construct a statistically sampled map of the physical state and metallicity of gaseous galaxy halos using the Cosmic Origins Spectrograph (COS) on the Hubble Space Telescope. We provide a detailed description of the optical data reduction and subsequent spectral analysis that allow us to derive the physical properties of this uniquely data-rich sample of galaxies. The galaxy sample is divided into 38 pre-selected L similar to L*, z similar to 0.2 target galaxies and 29 bonus galaxies that lie in close proximity to the QSO sightlines. We report galaxy spectroscopic redshifts accurate to +/- 30 km s(-1), impact parameters, rest-frame colors, stellar masses, total star formation rates (SFRs), and gas-phase interstellar medium oxygen abundances. When we compare the distribution of these galaxy characteristics to those of the general low-redshift population, we find good agreement. The L similar to L* galaxies in this sample span a diverse range of color (1.0 < u - r < 3.0), stellar mass (10(9.5) < M/M-circle dot < 10(11.5)), and SFRs (0.01-20M(circle dot) yr(-1)). These optical data, along with the COS UV spectroscopy, comprise the backbone of our efforts to understand how halo gas properties may correlate with their host galaxy properties, and ultimately to uncover the processes that drive gas outflow and/or are influenced by gas inflow.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据