4.6 Article

RESULTS OF THE LICK OBSERVATORY SUPERNOVA SEARCH FOLLOW-UP PHOTOMETRY PROGRAM: BVRI LIGHT CURVES OF 165 TYPE Ia SUPERNOVAE

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT SERIES
卷 190, 期 2, 页码 418-448

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0067-0049/190/2/418

关键词

galaxies: distances and redshifts; supernovae: general

资金

  1. US National Science Foundation [AST-0607485, AST-0908886]
  2. TABASGO Foundation
  3. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-08ER41563]
  4. Sun Microsystems, Inc.
  5. Hewlett-Packard Company
  6. AutoScope Corporation
  7. Lick Observatory
  8. NSF
  9. University of California
  10. Sylvia & Jim Katzman Foundation
  11. NASA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present BVRI light curves of 165 Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) from the Lick Observatory Supernova Search follow-up photometry program from 1998 through 2008. Our light curves are typically well sampled (cadence of 3-4 days) with an average of 21 photometry epochs. We describe our monitoring campaign and the photometry reduction pipeline that we have developed. Comparing our data set to that of Hicken et al., with which we have 69 overlapping supernovae (SNe), we find that as an ensemble the photometry is consistent, with only small overall systematic differences, although individual SNe may differ by as much as 0.1 mag, and occasionally even more. Such disagreement in specific cases can have significant implications for combining future large data sets. We present an analysis of our light curves which includes template fits of light-curve shape parameters useful for calibrating SNe Ia as distance indicators. Assuming the B - V color of SNe Ia at 35 days past maximum light can be presented as the convolution of an intrinsic Gaussian component and a decaying exponential attributed to host-galaxy reddening, we derive an intrinsic scatter of sigma = 0.076 +/- 0.019 mag, consistent with the Lira-Phillips law. This is the first of two papers, the second of which will present a cosmological analysis of the data presented herein.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据