4.6 Review

GALAXY CLUSTERS IDENTIFIED FROM THE SDSS DR6 AND THEIR PROPERTIES

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT SERIES
卷 183, 期 2, 页码 197-213

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/0067-0049/183/2/197

关键词

galaxies: clusters: general; galaxies: distances and redshifts

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation (NNSF) of China [10773016, 10821061, 1083303]
  2. National Key Basic Research Science Foundation of China [2007CB815403]
  3. Doctoral Foundation of SYNU of China [054-55440105020]
  4. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  5. Participating Institutions
  6. National Science Foundation
  7. U.S. Department of Energy
  8. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  9. Japanese Monbukagakusho
  10. Max Planck Society
  11. Higher Education Funding Council for England

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Clusters of galaxies in most of the previous catalogs have redshifts z <= 0.3. Using the photometric redshifts of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 6 (SDSS DR6), we identify 39,716 clusters in the redshift range 0.05 < z < 0.6 with more than eight luminous (M-r <= -21) member galaxies. Cluster redshifts are estimated accurately with an uncertainty of less than 0.022. The contamination rate of member galaxies is found to be roughly 20%, and the completeness of member galaxy detection reaches similar to 90%. Monte Carlo simulations show that the cluster detection rate is more than 90% for massive (M-200 > 2 x 10(14) M-circle dot) clusters of z <= 0.42. The false detection rate is similar to 5%. We obtain the richness, the summed luminosity, and the gross galaxy number within the determined radius for identified clusters. They are tightly related to the X-ray luminosity and temperature of clusters. Cluster mass is related to the richness and summed luminosity with M-200 proportional to R-1.90 +/- 0.04 and M-200 proportional to L-r(1.64 +/- 0.03) , respectively. In addition, 790 new candidates of X-ray clusters are found by cross-identification of our clusters with the source list of the ROSAT X-ray survey.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据