4.4 Article

Release of hepatocyte growth factor from mechanically stretched skeletal muscle satellite cells and role of pH and nitric oxide

期刊

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF THE CELL
卷 13, 期 8, 页码 2909-2918

出版社

AMER SOC CELL BIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E02-01-0062

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Application of mechanical stretch to cultured adult rat muscle satellite cells results in release of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) and accelerated entry into the cell cycle. Stretch activation of cultured rat muscle satellite cells was observed only when medium pH was between 7.1 and 7.5, even though activation of satellite cells was accelerated by exogenous HGF over a pH range from 6.9 to 7.8. Furthermore, HGF was only released in stretched cultures when the pH of the medium was between 7.1 and 7.4. Conditioned medium from stretched satellite cell cultures stimulated activation of unstretched satellite cells, and the addition of anti-HGF neutralizing antibodies to stretch-conditioned medium inhibited the stretch activation response. Conditioned medium from satellite cells that were stretched in the presence of nitric-oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitor N-omega -nitro-L-arginine methyl ester hydrochloride did not accelerate activation of unstretched control satellite cells, and HGF was not released into the medium. Conditioned medium from unstretched cells that were treated with a nitric oxide donor, sodium nitroprusside dihydrate, was able to accelerate the activation of satellite cells in vitro, and HGF was found in the conditioned medium. Immunoblot analysis indicated that both neuronal and endothelial NOS isoforms were present in satellite cell cultures. Furthermore, assays of NOS activity in stretched satellite cell cultures demonstrated that NOS is stimulated when satellite cells are stretched in vitro. These experiments indicate that stretch triggers an intracellular cascade of events, including nitric oxide synthesis, which results in HGF release and satellite cell activation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据