4.5 Article

Involvement of replicative polymerases, Tel1p, Mec1p, Cdc13p, and the Ku complex in telomere-telomere recombination

期刊

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY
卷 22, 期 16, 页码 5679-5687

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.22.16.5679-5687.2002

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Telomere maintenance is required for chromosome stability, and telomeres are typically replicated by the action of the reverse transcriptase telomerase. In both tumor and yeast cells that lack telomerase, telomeres are maintained by an alternative recombination mechanism. Genetic studies have led to the identification of DNA polymerases, cell cycle checkpoint proteins, and telomere binding proteins involved in the telomerase pathway. However, how these proteins affect telomere-telomere recombination has not been identified to date. Using an assay to trace the in vivo recombinational products throughout the course of survivor development, we show here that three major replicative polymerases, alpha, delta, and epsilon, play roles in telomere-telomere recombination and that each causes different effects and phenotypes when they as well as the telomerase are defective. Polymerase delta appears to be the main activity for telomere extension, since neither type I nor type 11 survivors arising via telomere-telomere recombination were seen in its absence. The frequency of type I versus type 11 is altered in the polymerase alpha and epsilon mutants relative to the wild type. Each prefers to develop a particular type of survivor. Moreover, type 11 recombination is mediated by the cell cycle checkpoint proteins Tell and Mec1, and telomere-telomere recombination is regulated by telomere binding protein Cdc13 and the Ku complex. Together, our results suggest that coordination between DNA replication machinery, DNA damage signaling, DNA recombination machinery, and the telomere protein-DNA complex allows telomere recombination to repair telomeric ends in the absence of telomerase.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据