期刊
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION
卷 17, 期 8, 页码 349-350出版社
ELSEVIER SCIENCE LONDON
DOI: 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02545-4
关键词
-
Scientists are measured by their publications. Yet anonymous peer review is far from transparent. Does bias lurk within the refereeing process? Investigating the outcomes of manuscript submissions suggests that the overall process is not sexist, but differences in acceptance rates across journals according to gender of the first author give grounds for caution. Manuscripts with more authors and by native English speakers are more successful; whether this is due to bias remains to be seen.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据