4.7 Article

Comparative stability studies of antipseudomonal β-lactams for potential administration through portable elastomeric pumps (home therapy for cystic fibrosis patients) and motor-operated syringes (intensive care units)

期刊

ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY
卷 46, 期 8, 页码 2327-2332

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.46.8.2327-2332.2002

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The stability of antipseudomonal beta-lactams in concentrated solutions was examined in view of their potential administration by continuous infusion with external pumps (for intensive care patients) or with portable pumps carried under clothing (for cystic fibrosis patients). Aztreonam (100 g/liter), piperacillin (128 g/liter, with tazobactam), and azlocillin (128 g/liter) remained 90% stable for up to more than 24 hat 37degreesC (meziocillin [128 g/liter] as stable at 25degreesC but not at 37degreesC)Ceftazidime (120 g/liter), cefpirome (32 g/liter), and cefepime (50 g/liter) remained 90% stable for up to 24, 23.7, and 20.5 h at 25degreesC but only for 8, 7.25, and 13 h at 37degreesC, respectively. The control of temperature therefore appears to be critical for all three cephalosporins that cannot be recommended for use in portable pumps carried under clothes for prolonged periods for reasons of stability. Cefpirome and cefepime solutions developed an important color change (from light yellow to dark red) upon exposure when stored at 30degreesC or higher. Degradation of ceftazidime was accompanied by the liberation of pyridine which, at 37degreesC, was in excess of what is allowed by the U.S. Pharmacopeia, i.e., 1.1 mg/liter, after 8 and 12 h for drug concentrations of 12 and 8.3%, respectively. Imipenem and meropenem are too unstable (10% degradation at 25degreesC after 3.5 and 5.15 h, respectively) to be recommended for use by continuous infusion. Faropenem, examined in comparison with imipenem and meropenem, proved as stable as aztreonam or piperacillin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据