4.6 Article

CARBON MONOXIDE IN THE COLD DEBRIS OF SUPERNOVA 1987A

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
卷 773, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/773/2/L34

关键词

ISM: supernova remnants; supernovae: individual (SN1987A)

资金

  1. National Science Foundation
  2. NSF [AST-1211196]
  3. Belgian Science Policy office through the ESA Prodex program
  4. ESO/Keele studentship
  5. MICINN [AYA2009-130360-C02-02]
  6. Generalitat Valenciana [PROMETEO 104/2009]
  7. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/K000926/1, ST/G002355/1, ST/J000035/1, PP/D000955/1, ST/J001384/1, ST/J001511/1, PP/F000057/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. STFC [PP/F000057/1, ST/J000035/1, ST/G002355/1, ST/J001384/1, ST/K000926/1, PP/D000955/1, ST/J001511/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  10. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1211196] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report spectroscopic and imaging observations of rotational transitions of cold CO and SiO in the ejecta of SN1987A, the first such emission detected in a supernova remnant. In addition to line luminosities for the CO J = 1-0, 2-1, 6-5, and 7-6 transitions, we present upper limits for all other transitions up to J = 13-12, collectively measured from the Atacama Large Millimeter Array, the Atacama Pathfinder EXperiment, and the Herschel Spectral and Photometric Imaging REceiver. Simple models show the lines are emitted from at least 0.01 M-circle dot of CO at a temperature >14 K, confined within at most 35% of a spherical volume expanding at similar to 2000 km s(-1). Moreover, we locate the emission within 1 '' of the central debris. These observations, along with a partial observation of SiO, confirm the presence of cold molecular gas within supernova remnants and provide insight into the physical conditions and chemical processes in the ejecta. Furthermore, we demonstrate the powerful new window into supernova ejecta offered by submillimeter observations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据