4.8 Article

Importance of Helicobacter pylori oipA in clinical presentation, gastric inflammation, and mucosal interleukin 8 production

期刊

GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 123, 期 2, 页码 414-424

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/gast.2002.34781

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK56338, DK53659] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background & Aims: Disease-associated virulence factors of Helicobacter pylori may not be independent of one another. The aim was to determine which H. pylori virulence factor(s) was the most important predictor of severity of gastric inflammation or clinical outcome. Metho : cag Pathogenicity island (PAI), vacA, babA2, and iceA status were determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). oipA functionality was based on switch status determined by PCR-based sequencing. A backward stepwise multiple regression analysis was performed to determine which factor(s) was the most discriminating for clinical outcome as well as the relationship to mucosal histology (H. pylori density, neutrophil infiltration, intestinal metaplasia, and gastric atrophy) and mucosal interleukin 8 (IL-8) production. Results: H. pylori were obtained from 247 patients (86 with gastritis, 86 with duodenal ulcer, and 75 with gastric carcinoma). Although oipA status was closely linked to specific cag PAI, vacA, and babA2 genotypes, only oipA status remained in the final model to discriminate duodenal ulcer from gastritis (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 5 and 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.1-11.9). Among the factors, only a functional oipA was significantly associated with high H. pylori density, severe neutrophil infiltration, and high mucosal IL-8 levels (P < 0.001). oipA status had no relationship to gastric atrophic changes. Conclusions: oipA functional status was related to clinical presentation, H. pylori density, and gastric inflammation. cag PAI, babA2, or vacA status appear important only as surrogate markers for a functional oipA gene.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据