4.6 Article

UNVEILING A NETWORK OF PARALLEL FILAMENTS IN THE INFRARED DARK CLOUD G14.225-0.506

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
卷 764, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/764/2/L26

关键词

ISM: clouds; ISM: individual objects (G14.225-0.506); stars: formation

资金

  1. Italian Space Agency (ASI) fellowship [I/005/07/0]
  2. Spanish MICINN grant [AYA2011-30228-C03]
  3. FEDER funds
  4. JAE-Doc CSIC fellowship
  5. European Social Fund, under the program Junta para la Ampliacion de Estudios
  6. AGAUR grant [2009SGR1172]
  7. CNPq
  8. FAPEMIG

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present the results of combined NH3 (1,1) and (2,2) line emission observed with the Very Large Array and the Effelsberg 100 m telescope of the infrared dark cloud G14.225-0.506. The NH3 emission reveals a network of filaments constituting two hub-filament systems. Hubs are associated with gas of rotational temperature T-rot similar to 15 K, non-thermal velocity dispersion sigma(NT) similar to 1 km s(-1), and exhibit signs of star formation, while filaments appear to be more quiescent (T-rot similar to 11 K and sigma(NT) similar to 0.6 km s(-1)). Filaments are parallel in projection and distributed mainly along two directions, at P.A. similar to 10 degrees and 60 degrees, and appear to be coherent in velocity. The averaged projected separation between adjacent filaments is between 0.5 pc and 1 pc, and the mean width of filaments is 0.12 pc. Cores within filaments are separated by similar to 0.33 +/- 0.09 pc, which is consistent with the predicted fragmentation of an isothermal gas cylinder due to the sausage-type instability. The network of parallel filaments observed in G14.225-0.506 is consistent with the gravitational instability of a thin gas layer threaded by magnetic fields. Overall, our data suggest that magnetic fields might play an important role in the alignment of filaments, and polarization measurements in the entire cloud would lend further support to this scenario.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据