4.6 Article

Does correction of the friedewald formula using lipoprotein(a) change our estimation of ischemic heart disease risk?: The Quebec Cardiovascular Study

期刊

ATHEROSCLEROSIS
卷 163, 期 2, 页码 261-267

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9150(02)00034-5

关键词

lipoprotein (a); LDL-cholesterol; coronary heart disease; epidemiology; population studies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: LDL-cholesterol is usually calculated using the Friedewald formula. This calculation method does not take into account the presence of Lp(a), which is associated with LDL-cholesterol. Dahlen has suggested that the Friedewald formula should be modified to account for Lp(a) associated cholesterol. This study was undertaken to determine if correction of the Friedewald formula would result in a better evaluation of ischemic heart disease (IHD) risk. Methods: 2222 men free from IHD were prospectively followed for 5 years for the appearance of myocardial infarction, coronary insufficiency or coronary death. At the baseline evaluation all had a complete fasting lipid profile which included Lp(a) determinations. LDL-cholesterol levels were calculated from total cholesterol, total triglycerides and HDL-cholesterol using the Friedewald formula and also using the Dahlen modification of the Friedewald formula. Results: During the follow-up there were 89 first IHD events. Both types of LDL-cholesterol calculations showed that the last fertile of the LDL-cholesterol distribution in comparison to the first tertile, doubles the relative risk (RR: 2.15; 95% confidence limits: 1.23-3.75) using the Friedewald formula (RR: 2.18; 95% confidence limits: 1.25-3.81) using the Dahlen modification. Lp(a) levels were not an independent predictor of IHD risk. Conclusion: Modification of the Friedewald formula to account for Lp(a) levels does not improve our evaluation of IHD risk. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据