4.6 Article

EVIDENCE FOR MULTIPLE SOURCES OF 10Be IN THE EARLY SOLAR SYSTEM

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
卷 748, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/748/2/L25

关键词

astrochemistry; meteorites, meteors, meteoroids; nuclear reactions, nucleosynthesis, abundances; protoplanetary disks

资金

  1. Danish National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Beryllium-10 is a short-lived radionuclide (t(1/2) = 1.4Myr) uniquely synthesized by spallation reactions and inferred to have been present when the solar system's oldest solids (calcium-aluminum-rich inclusions, CAIs) formed. Yet, the astrophysical site of Be-10 nucleosynthesis is uncertain. We report Li-Be-B isotope measurements of CAIs from CV chondrites, including CAIs that formed with the canonical Al-26/Al-27 ratio of similar to 5 x 10(-5) (canonical CAIs) and CAIs with Fractionation and Unidentified Nuclear isotope effects (FUN-CAIs) characterized by Al-26/Al-27 ratios much lower than the canonical value. Our measurements demonstrate the presence of four distinct fossil Be-10/Be-9 isochrons, lower in the FUN-CAIs than in the canonical CAIs, and variable within these classes. Given that FUN-CAI precursors escaped evaporation-recondensation prior to evaporative melting, we suggest that the Be-10/Be-9 ratio recorded by FUN-CAIs represents a baseline level present in presolar material inherited from the protosolar molecular cloud, generated via enhanced trapping of galactic cosmic rays. The higher and possibly variable apparent Be-10/Be-9 ratios of canonical CAIs reflect additional spallogenesis, either in the gaseous CAI-forming reservoir, or in the inclusions themselves: this indicates at least two nucleosynthetic sources of Be-10 in the early solar system. The most promising locale for Be-10 synthesis is close to the proto-Sun during its early mass-accreting stages, as these are thought to coincide with periods of intense particle irradiation occurring on timescales significantly shorter than the formation interval of canonical CAIs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据